Monday, January 9, 2012

A KNACK FOR QUALITY: THE YEARS WITH DEMING


THE YEARS WITH DEMING

By Richard J. Noyes

I was with the Center for Advanced Engineering Study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology when I first heard of W. Edwards Deming. I should have known about him prior to 1980 and was grateful to Steve Lohr, NY Times business writer who wrote columns in the business section of the Times on consecutive Sundays: “The Man Who Taught the Japanese” and “More about the Man Who Taught the Japanese.” 
    I learned that the Deming Prize was the most sought-after and distinguished award that a Japanese company could aspire to and it was named for an American. I also learned that General Douglas MacArthur, architect of U.S. victory in the Pacific and Proconsul of postwar Japan, brought Dr. Deming to Japan to assist him in restoring the country’s economy.
    Dr. Deming spoke nationwide to groups of Japanese business leaders. He told them that if they followed his 14 Points of Management and employed statistical process control Japan would quickly become a world leader in output of goods and quality of manufacturing. They followed his advice and Deming’s prophecy became truth. The success was so vast that soon Japan became a prime lender to the U.S.  
     William Edwards Deming was born with the 20th Century, now popularly known as the American Century. He endured a Wyoming upbringing of hardship, and went on to earn a Yale doctorate in mathematical physics. Deming worked for the U.S. Census Bureau during WW11 and studied under the tutelage of Dr. William Shewhart, best known for the Shewhart Control Chart, one of the major tools of statistical process control. When used correctly, a control chart can help determine whether a manufacturing process is in statistical control.
When systems are in statistical control there is less variations in processes, and the opportunity to produce goods with uniformly high quality is enhanced. When systems are not in control, quality is inconsistent, waste is excessive, rework is needed and productivity slips.
    Steve Lohr’s NY Times’ articles mentioned that although Dr. Deming was a legend in Japan, he was little-known in his own country. I saw that we were wasting a valuable asset and set out to do something about it. I called Dr. Deming’s office in Washington, D.C. and described my interest in meeting Dr. Deming to Cecelia Kilian his impressive and capable secretary. She arranged a dinner in Framingham, Massachusetts a week or so later.
    Dr. Deming was giving a four-day seminar to a group of local business people. We met at a nearby restaurant. As I walked through the restaurant, populated by seminar attendees, with the tall and ruggedly built Dr. Deming, a specimen at 80, many heads turned and watched him. It was The Look that Hollywood extras give as they watch Jesus pass by on a donkey. That was when I realized that I was in the company of a great man.
    After we sat, Dr. Deming’s first question to me was, “Mr. Noyes, what are you doing for your country?”
    After attempting to swallow my Adam’s apple I said that one of my responsibilities at MIT was to oversee the production and distribution of videotapes for the continuing education of practicing engineers, scientists, mathematicians and technical managers. Dr. Deming said, “That’s a worthy contribution,” and we were off to a good start. I then said that I thought that studio-produced videotapes of his program of management improvement would make a vital contribution to American industry. He seemed interested and asked many questions, all of which were thoughtful and challenging.
    Dr. Deming was a gracious dinner partner who laughed easily and showed a particular appetite for fine red wine, clam chowder and vanilla ice cream. As we prepared to leave, I said, “Dr. Deming, I hope you will do the tapes with MIT.”    
    He replied in his deep and dramatic voice, “Mr. Noyes, we must do the tapes.”

As we prepared for the first taping a few weeks later, I asked Dr. Deming if he had written and published a book based on his methods and teaching. He said, “I have a book, but I cannot publish it.” I asked, why not, and he said, “Because all of the publishers who have contacted me wish to change my work and I cannot have that. The book must be published exactly as I have written it. No changes will be tolerated.”
    Mentally panting like a Great Dane imaging a T-Bone I went out on a long and initially unsupported limb and told him that the Center for Advanced Engineering Study was a publisher, which we were, and that we would publish his book as is. Dr. Deming said, “I accept that, but to show that you mean what you say, you must first publish my book based on printing from typewritten pages that I give you making any transposition impossible.” I replied that we would do that. The limb was growing longer.
    Even though I hadn’t seen Dr. Deming’s book, it was clear that he had a logical, steel-trap mind and spoke in fluid sentences and paragraphs. I had no doubt that he was a competent writer and that his story was legend. (“When the fact becomes legend, print the legend.” –The Man who Shot Liberty Valance.) I also knew that my boss, Professor Myron Tribus, Director of the Center, would back me. Myron had been a senior vice president at Xerox, had strong business instincts and was experimental in the best sense of the term. He later became a widely-traveled spokesperson on behalf of Dr. Deming.
    Our senior producer, Mrs. Elizabeth DeRienzo, a young woman gifted in multiple ways, quickly established a strong working relationship with Dr. Deming. It’s fair to say that the publishing of the Deming videotapes and books would have been far more difficult without Elizabeth’s leadership and abundant interpersonal and business skills.
    Quality in business is like control in pitching. Without them you have nothing, and with them you have everything, or at least a foundation upon which you can build a durable business or career. The years with Deming made me, and I believe many others at the Center, far better businesspeople. I wished that I’d learned from Deming earlier in my career before I worked at Westinghouse and IBM. But since the job before us was to spread Dr. Deming’s philosophy in the interest of improving America’s competitive position, we had to live that philosophy ourselves.
    Here’s what happened: We learned that you can’t install quality like an engine or a transmission. The capacity to deliver quality goods and services is a reflection of an organization’s underlying way of doing business, and it must derive from top management because they are the only ones who can implement meaningful change.
     To illustrate this point, let’s look at the utility of automotive door bangers. The Pontiac division of General Motors used Dr. Deming as a consultant, and for several years this paid off in improved quality and increased sales. One of the Pontiac executives told me that an early step was to go to Japan and learn from those who had adopted Deming’s methods. He went on the factory floor and asked to see the door bangers and learn how they were trained. The confused Japanese executives and managers didn’t know what he was talking about. The Pontiac man explained that during final inspection his assembly line workers climbed inside the cars with rubber hammers and a black light and whacked away at the doors until they were sealed as best they could.
The Japanese managers found this to be hilarious. They explained that their doors arrived at the plant just in time for assembly and each one fit perfectly. In other words, the Japanese automotive manufacturer worked only with suppliers who could (a) deliver parts on time and (b) deliver parts of consistently quality, or in a state of statistical control fit for use with no appreciable variation. The Pontiac executive also noticed that there were no stacks of doors in inventory. The Japanese manufacturer wasn’t paying for storage. The supplier provided doors and other parts as they were needed. Finally, he saw that the assembly line workers operated in teams and used quality tools like control charts right on the factory floor. The Pontiac man understood that they had a long way to go before reaching parity in manufacturing quality.
The Japanese manufacturers didn’t just focus on quality of manufactured goods, it extended to quality of service as well. For example, in the year that Toyota achieved 50% of GM’s annual revenue they employed 100 people in their headquarters marketing services/order processing department. GM employed several thousand.
Quality pays in many ways. As Dr. Deming said, it is the best way to improve productivity because there is less rework and less waste and fewer workers are needed to repair damage. Quality also pays off in pricing. On many nights, I picked Dr. Deming up at his Boston club. He was on time, except for one night when he was 20 minutes late. He apologized and said that he had received an urgent call from Dr. Toyoda, head of Toyota Motors. (I never learned the reason for the different spelling.) At all events, Dr. Deming seemed preoccupied and I asked if a problem was weighing on him. He said that Dr. Toyoda was upset over the quota set by the U.S. government on the import of Japanese automobiles and wanted Dr. Deming’s advice on what to do. A long pause ensued. Deming was not a man to volunteer anything. He was purely Socratic. Unable to bear not knowing what happened, I asked if he’d mind telling me what advice he gave, Dr. Deming replied, “I told him to raise his prices.”
My first thought was, ‘That’s harsh and also unfair to American consumers.’ But after thinking about it I realized that Deming’s advice was on the money. First, quality does pay off. He knew that American consumers would still buy Toyotas, even at higher prices, if they were confident that the cars would be durable.
    To support this notion I thought of friends who car-shopped three years earlier and received an offer too tantalizing to turn down. The local Toyota dealer suggested a whopping discount if they bought two cars. They did, and for the next three years my friends enjoyed six years worth of maintenance-free, trouble-free transportation and swore they would never go back to American cars.
The reputation for quality established over many years by Toyota made them the number one car company in the world and probably the best company overall as well. Alas, they lost track of quality late in the first decade of the new millennium, didn’t respond nimbly, suffered endless vehicle recalls and lost their competitive position. The Big Three caught a break, and when saved by the government’s massive infusion of cash came back with a vengeance to recapture an impressive amount of market share. When Toyota executives visited Professor Tribus’s office in the Center for Advanced Engineering Study at MIT some years earlier they would have done well to pay attention to an amusing, but prescient small, framed saying on his wall: “Entropy is increasing.”
    Now, back to the fairness to American manufacturers of Deming’s advice to raise prices on Toyotas? The quota on the import of Japanese cars was imposed around the time of the 1980’s Chrysler bailout. Japanese car manufacturers were killing the American Big Three, and, as shown in the anecdote above, they were killing them on quality.
    When I quizzed Dr. Deming further about his advice, he said that quotas never work, they only delay the inevitable, and, in this case, it was misguided government interference under prodding from the Big Three that gave American automobile manufacturers an excuse not to improve their quality and compete long-term with the Japanese. Not long afterward, Dr. Deming began consulting with American car companies and divisions, among them Ford and the Cadillac division of GM,  plus the aforementioned Pontiac division. All three soon became more competitive on quality.
Donald Petersen, CEO of Ford from 1985-1989 became a disciple of Dr. Deming and it paid off for Ford launching the company on a path to quality parity with the Japanese. Ford remains number one in quality among the Big Three and continues to improve its international competitive position.
W. Edwards Deming was fearless and bowed to no businessperson irrespective of their position. If you hired Deming, you did things his way or he no longer continued to do business with you. It was all-in Texas Hold ‘em. One of his clients was the Nashua Corporation. The CEO told me that the first meeting with Dr. Deming included the Nashua division managers. A few hours into the meeting the CEO needed to use the toilet. He tried to slip out. Dr. Deming asked where he was going and when told asked him to sit down. You didn’t walk out of a meeting with Deming for any reason. When in doubt wear a diaper.
I mentioned above that Center personnel had to adopt Deming’s methods in the interest of representing him adequately. You may recall that Dr. Deming insisted that we publish his magnum opus as is. Although we agreed we also knew that a book on quality couldn’t go out with any typos. One of Dr. Deming’s favorite anecdotes involved proofreading. He said that you couldn’t use two proofreaders because then no one would have a job.
No book in the history of publishing was proofread so thoroughly. Everybody worked on it. A few minor typos were found, quietly fixed by Cecelia Kilian, Dr. Deming’s marvelous secretary, and pages were sent back to us. Then we employed two freelance proofreaders of impeccable credentials. Each was told that they were the only proofreader and the book they were to work on was written by the American quality guru, W. Edwards Deming. And because of the need to protect the reputations of MIT and Dr. Deming the book could not have any typos. We also gave them a list of idiosyncratic spellings like “aeroplane,” and put them to work. Neither one found a typo. I believe it was Lord Nelson who said something like: “There has been no problem. There is now no problem. And there will be no problem.”
We recognized that quality is hard work, and as someone said it is a journey, not a destination. A brochure was produced, mailing lists were purchased, Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position was printed (we swallowed hard and made an initial printing of 10,000 copies), and the echo came back loud and clear: the American business community wanted to know more about the philosophy of W. Edwards Deming. Multiple reprints totaling 175,000 books flew off the shelves in short order.
Meanwhile, we geared up our existing customer and marketing services and inventory operations. Internal staff remained lean, and we outsourced much of the work to outside vendors we knew from experience to be quality-conscious on an as-needed basis. Flow charts, control charts and other quality management tools papered the walls. Dr. Deming had made the observation that if you can’t flowchart your business operations you don’t really understand them. Moreover, he encouraged the writing of an operational definition for each system or process within that system so that everyone could move forward with constancy of purpose.
We also adopted a “no excuses” business philosophy,” another of Dr. Deming’s teachings. Once a business embraces the idea that excuses are a weak substitute for effectiveness, business practices become more efficient and the tendency is to do things right the first time.
Of course stuff happens, but only 6% of it comes from special causes those imperfections caused by individuals. 94% of errors are in the system and can only be fixed by management. A major part of no-excuses business management is for organizational leaders to stop blaming workers for alleged mistakes. As Dr. Deming pointed out, most workers want to do well. They just need to work in a system that doesn’t contain built-in flaws. Put another way, it was time to stop looking for “Who’s wrong” and start solving “What’s wrong.”
Dr. Deming illustrated the need for managers to create a serviceable system through the parable of the red beads. In this exercise which he called in his usual self-deprecating way “simple, stupid” some willing workers were asked to dip a paddle into a bowl of small white beads and come up with a clean result. Problem was that some red beads representing defects were snuck in. Every time a worker tried to produce error-free work a few red beads were on the paddle.
No matter how hard they tried, the workers failed and had to be let go. Dr. Deming concluded the experiment of the red beads by telling management that the red beads were their responsibility. And what they needed to do, as he commandeered in his rumbling, evangelical voice of God was to, “Get the red beads out of the bowl.”
Another lesson learned from Dr. Deming was to think statistically and make planning and acting on the planning a useful and gratifying experience. One of the major tools used by Dr. Deming was what he called the Shewhart Cycle of Plan, Do, Check, Act. In initiating the PDCA cycle, first Plan what you want accomplish over time. Do something that advances the planning. Check to see that the results of what you did matches the goals set in the planning. Act based on this information to sharpen your initial goals and make them successful.
We also used Tree Diagrams to help identify all the steps needed to be fulfilled in individual processes. Tree diagrams when properly used help eliminate the oops! factor that occurs when something obvious is left out of a process. Fishbone, or Cause and Effect Diagrams, also proved useful in determining how all the causes like the three P’s: People, Procedures, Policies affect actions and results. These are two tools among many we used in our quest to achieve total quality control (TQC). I think it was Emerson who said that cause and effect are two sides of the same fact. Whatever the meaning, the use of management tools helped us to think more analytically and statistically and maintain better control of the system used to further Center goals.
Staff at the Center for Advanced Engineering Study also worked on embracing Deming’s 14 points of management. We did try to create constancy of purpose while adopting the new philosophy and made notable progress. In addition, encouraging progress was made in breaking down barriers between staff areas and instituting a program of education geared to improve our business processes.
The studio-produced videotaping continued and we produced 14 in all. One major mistake was made. We didn’t include discussion topics. This was soon rectified. Business videotapes should be stopped frequently and topics discussed, especially topics that relate to one’s own business operations. Once suggested stopping points and discussion topics were inserted, the utility of the tapes increased manifold.
Videotaping Dr. Deming was a challenge. He would listen to direction and then proceed exactly as he wished. No chance of his looking into the camera. He simply plowed ahead roaming the stage, moving back and forth to various chalkboards and presenting brilliantly. It’s probably fair to say that all people of greatness are eccentric to some degree. No one controlled Dr. Deming. He operated on his own, and we lesser mortals tried to catch as much of his philosophy on tape as we could. One camera operator who was used to more conventional television production was doing a good job following Dr. Deming around the sprawling set. He said to me during a break, ”This man is a loose cannon.”
More to the point, Dr. Deming was tireless in advocating for quality improvement and would do anything to achieve it. He worked long hours seven days a week during his 80’s and into his 90’s. How he looked on camera never occurred to Dr. Deming. The message was the issue and how widely to it could be dispersed was the sole intent. He was an engine of responsibility who once had laser surgery on both eyes in Washington, D.C. in the morning and flew to Detroit for a Ford consultation that afternoon.
During the taping season, Dr. Deming worked on the update of his book, soon to be re-published and re-titled as Out of the Crisis. No more printing from typewritten pages. Drafts flew back and forth between MIT and D.C. And speaking of quality, we used Fedex every Friday and received the marked-up revisions on Monday for several months and they never missed, once.
During this time of intense videotaping and book development the staff worked long hours and was stretched. Dr. Deming was a taskmaster who demanded perfection on short notice. In one regrettable instance I wish I could have taken back, I made the comment under extreme pressure that we were doing our best. Dr. Deming told me in a level tone, “Mr. Noyes, your best is simply not good enough.”
He was right, so we quickened the pace like a squad of Seabees whose slogan in WW11 was, “The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer.” And to put a finer point on it, if you embark on a program of continuous improvement which we had done you must accept that your best is not good enough and can always be improved.
In his four-day seminars and in smaller consultancy meetings, attendees would invariably ask Dr. Deming questions along the lines of: “What should I do to implement quality?” Or, “What are the steps do I need to take to get a quality program going in my company?” In other words, what is the best shortcut to quality.
Deming’s typical answer, “You mean you want me to tell you what your job is?” Deming’s philosophy of management and the road to improved quality, productivity and competitive is a rough one not easily navigated. It takes study, hard work and the point of view that meaningful change has no easy fixes and to be successful it must be led by open-minded top management.
If you’ve been brushing up on your Shakespeare you may recall that Horatio, Hamlet’s university friend couldn’t understand or accept the idea of ghosts. So Hamlet encouraged him to expand his thinking: ‘There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio.’ Well, there are no ghosts in Deming’s philosophy, but there are untold riches if you’re willing to be open to them.
Enlightened executives like Don Petersen at Ford understood this. Too many other American business leaders never got it and likely never will. Read the tweets, postings, and other social media comments from U.S. management and you will rarely read references to quality. You will see slogans, exhortations and complaints about regulations, but scant mention of what makes customers loyal.
Dr. Deming wanted Out of the Crisis typeset and printed at Cambridge University Press in the UK. Gulp! Fortunately, we discovered that under U.S. Copyright law no more than a few thousand copies of a book could be imported into the U.S. without running the risk of losing copyright. Dr. Deming settled for typesetting in the UK and printing by a branch of Cambridge University Press in the U.S. And this worked out satisfactorily.
At the last count I know of, the Center shipped over 600,000 copies of Out of the Crisis. MIT sent royalty checks to authors semi-annually. Cecelia Kilian, Dr. Deming’s secretary told us that when the checks, also incorporating videotape sales, and well into the six figures, arrived at his office Dr. Deming liked to walk down the block with her to the local bank, stand in line and deposit the check. Invariably, a bank officer would spot Dr. Deming and Cecelia and escort them to his office for a chat. Now that’s quality customer service for you with no regard for dollar value.
Later, we condensed the original set of 14 videotapes into a revised set of four that included graphics and voiceover. We renamed this set of videotapes “The Essential Deming” and distributed over 1,000 copies. This set was used by many small businesses who couldn’t afford the longer and more expensive initial series of Deming videotapes. The set is a classic that succinctly enunciates the Deming philosophy. Elizabeth DeRienzo was the intrepid writer/producer/director.
I do not wish through this retrospective to imply that MIT was the sole entity in introducing W. Edwards Deming to American business. George Washington University in D.C. did an admirable job in running Dr. Deming’s four-day seminars nationwide. Many fine books were written by individuals who worked hard to spread the Deming philosophy. One of several regrets from that period was not working more closely with the other entities that were supporting Dr. Deming’s endeavors.
Shortly after the first set of videotapes was published two graduate students from the MIT Sloan School of Management stopped by and asked if they could watch the tapes. We set them up in a viewing room, and they came by for 14 straight business days until they had watched them all. When finished they stopped in to thank us and I asked, “What did you learn from watching Dr. Deming. One answered, “We learned more in two weeks than we did in two years at the Sloan School.”
I have great respect for the Sloan School and believe it to be one of the top graduate schools of business in the world. And I don’t believe that the two students really meant what they said. What I do know is that W. Edwards Deming had a profound impact on learning and those who “got” him never forgot his lessons.
This retrospective was solely derived from my recollections. Any errors are exclusively mine. Looking back on long stints at IBM, Westinghouse and MIT, the years with Deming was my defining business experience. Dr. Deming made you grow and be better. And although he was tough and demanding to a fault, W. Edwards Deming was a good person, a true patriot and a great man who loved his country. His death in 1993 was an incalculable loss. I hope that his management and quality lessons will never be forgotten and always used by U.S. businesses.

Richard J. Noyes, former Associate Director, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a consultant to public and private sector organizations.

Noyes is the co-author with Pamela J. Robertson of Larceny of Love, a provocative print and eBook novel that traces the interwoven careers of three men in jeopardy (one of whom is a professional pitcher who experiences sudden, extreme, unexplained, career-threatening wildness) and the unforgettable women in their lives.  http://amzn.to/u0LtvX          http://bit.ly/upp8hX  (Nook)     http://bit.ly/v1qaGe  (Google e-Books)

“Whenever dramatic storytelling about people you like is created around business, sports and film, I'm a happy reader. I'm sure you will be as well.”  –Kevin Marcus, Sotheby Vice President      

Another recent print and eBook by Richard Noyes and Pamela Robertson: Guts in the Clutch: 77 Legendary Triumphs, Heartbreaks, and Wild Finishes in 12 Sports, with a Foreword by Drew Olson of ESPN.   http://gutsintheclutch.com/
“The best compilation of fascinating sports stories I have read.” -David Houle, Emmy and Peabody Award-winning producer of documentaries on Hank Aaron and the Harlem Globetrotters.







           
           
           
           
           
           
           

           


Wednesday, November 30, 2011

THE KNACK OF INDEFINABLE PRESENCE



By
Richard J. Noyes


Something that has always intrigued me is the innate ability of some people to automatically command attention and respect. This magical quality of natural and unforced charisma is typically possessed by successful people and encompasses professions from art to zoology. Presence is not a physical or learned skill it is incorporated into the person.
When Joe Carlino, former speaker of the New York House of Representatives and later a prosperous lawyer, was in a room for social or business reasons everyone looked to him. He didn’t seek attention. It just happened like filings drawn to a magnet.
     Like Joe Carlino, Louis Smullin, former Head of Electrical Engineering and Dean of Engineering at MIT, was not an especially prepossessing man. But when he entered a room the chemistry changed, and Lou took over without fuss or apparent effort. When people with the knack for leadership talk others listen and follow.
     When size and personal dynamism are part of the flair the mix becomes more powerful. T. Vincent Learson, the tall, hawk-featured, unvarnished Chairman and CEO of IBM in the early 1970’s led effortlessly. As executive vice president in the early 1960’s, Learson was the driving force behind IBM’s successful multibillion-dollar gamble on the System/360 mainframe computer project. The 360 triumph gave IBM the mainframe lead for 20 years and paved Learson’s elevation to company leadership. With a rare combination of intellect, command, fear and respect, no businessperson dominated a room like T. Vincent Learson. 
      I was in a Chicago restaurant bar waiting with friends for a table. Michael Jordan was standing a few steps down the bar with two other men. Three young women were sitting in front of Michael. Michael tapped one of them on the shoulder and asked if he could set his drink down on the bar. She turned and screamed, “Oh my God it’s Michael and he touched me.”
     When Ted Williams, who was often compared to John Wayne for size and presence, walked into a room or onto the field you simply didn’t see anyone else. With his Hollywood good looks and booming personality, opposing players, umpires and everybody else were completely transfixed. As a Boston sportswriter once wrote, “Ted is tall, tan and terrific.”

Richard J. Noyes, former Associate Director, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a consultant to public and private sector organizations.

Noyes is the co-author with Pamela J. Robertson of Larceny of Love, a provocative print and eBook novel that traces the interwoven careers of three men in jeopardy (one of whom is a professional pitcher who experiences sudden, extreme, unexplained, career-threatening wildness) and the unforgettable women in their lives.  http://amzn.to/u0LtvX          http://bit.ly/upp8hX  (Nook)    
http://bit.ly/v1qaGe  (Google e-Books)
“Whenever dramatic storytelling about people you like is created around business, sports and film, I'm a happy reader. I'm sure you will be as well.”  –Kevin Marcus, Sotheby Vice President      

Another recent print and eBook by Richard Noyes and Pamela Robertson: Guts in the Clutch: 77 Legendary Triumphs, Heartbreaks, and Wild Finishes in 12 Sports, with a Foreword by Drew Olson of ESPN.   http://gutsintheclutch.com/
“The best compilation of fascinating sports stories I have read.” -David Houle, Emmy and Peabody Award-winning producer of documentaries on Hank Aaron and the Harlem Globetrotters.

Monday, November 21, 2011

NAVY SEALS' KNACK


By Richard J. Noyes

 

In our extended series on knack, we’ve looked for the most knackish of all professions. It might be the successful head of a big country or corporation or a Nobel laureate, but on a more practical level it’s likely the aptitude needed to become a Navy Seal. (And Navy Seals are in the news again with the recent rescue of an American woman and a Danish man in Somalia.)


But first some background on the type of person who aspires to be a Seal: A 17-year-old neighbor named Joe went into to the city to meet his girlfriend. During his late evening bus ride home to the near suburbs he noticed and ignored a group of five or six rowdy young men around his age in the back of the bus. Soon, and without warning, a member of the group hit Joe over the head from behind with a stick. After being momentarily stunned, Joe grabbed the perpetrator and coldcocked him. The bus driver intervened, kicked the gang, including the revived assailant, off the bus, and Joe rode on to his stop.

Once Joe’s father saw the ugly, bloody gash in his son’s head he got him into the car, and they headed to the emergency room of the local hospital. Coincidentally, they retraced the bus route. They soon stopped at a red light, and Joe saw the miscreants who attacked him across the street hanging outside a diner. He jumped out of the car, threaded through traffic, and waded into the group, fists like pistons, knocking them every which way until they ran off.

A year later, Joe joined the Marines. Following basic training and a tour of duty in the first Iraq war, where he saw action, Joe applied for admission into the Navy Seals’ training program and was accepted.

Among a thousand applicants, four out of five men who start training wash out. It may be the hardest physical training any group anywhere goes through. Many of the recruits are ex-athletes who must survive the pain of “Hell Week” while showing they can help others. They work out 20 hours a day, run 200 miles, sleep four hours total and absorb constant harassment while surviving cold water in underwater demolition drills. Like astronauts, Navy Seals must have the right stuff.

They learn to take out pirates, criminals and terrorists like Osama Bin Laden. Navy Seals’ Team 6, the group who killed Bin Laden and rescued American hostages in Somalia, are the elite of the elite. These men are tough, smart and diplomatic when necessary. They solve problems amid chaos and have the instinct for correct decision-making.

Shortly after Joe entered Seals’ training we moved to a distant city and never learned what happened to him. Everything we knew about Joe¾his presence, physique, intelligence, quiet self-possession and direct, respectful manner predicted success and the potential to be an American hero.

Note: Limited research of the Navy Seals’ training regimen was conducted on the Internet and from other sources. I believe that all of it qualifies as common information. However, if I have inadvertently used someone else’s language and knowledge contributions without attribution, I apologize and I am grateful for the help. Thank you. Richard Noyes

Richard J. Noyes, former Associate Director, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a consultant to public and private sector organizations.

Noyes is the co-author with Pamela J. Robertson of Larceny of Love, a provocative print and eBook novel that traces the interwoven careers of three men in jeopardy (one of whom is a professional pitcher who experiences sudden, extreme, unexplained, career-threatening wildness) and the unforgettable women in their lives. (Amazon print and e-Book. Nook and Google e-Books.)

“Whenever dramatic storytelling about people you like is created around business, sports and film, I'm a happy reader. I'm sure you will be as well.”  –Kevin Marcus, Vice President, Sotheby

Another recent print and eBook by Richard Noyes and Pamela Robertson: Guts in the Clutch: 77 Legendary Triumphs, Heartbreaks, and Wild Finishes in 12 Sports, with a Foreword by Drew Olson of ESPN. (Amazon print and e-Book. Nook and Google e-Books.)

“The best compilation of fascinating sports stories I have read.” -David Houle, Emmy and Peabody Award-winning producer of documentaries on Hank Aaron and the Harlem Globetrotters.




 

Friday, November 18, 2011

CURSE OF THE BILLY GOAT, OR THE LOVABLE LOSERS KNACK FOR LOSING



By Richard J. Noyes


When they won four pennants and two World Series between 1906 and 1910 the Chicago Cubs, famed for the double-play flair of Tinker to Evers to Chance, were a perennial National League powerhouse. When the Cubs beat Detroit in 1908, it was their second straight World Series victory over the Tigers (and they have waited over a century for another). These successes are more notable given that the participants in the most famous double play combination in baseball history didn’t get along and barely spoke to each other. And Frank Chance was also the manager, not much hand-holding back then.
Due to an outlandish adventure, a late September 1908 game with the New York Giants was called due to darkness and ended in a tie. Except for a “bonehead” play by utility man Fred Merkle the Giants would have won. With a runner on third and Merkle on first with two outs in the bottom of the 9th inning the batter singled in the winning run, but Merkle forgot to tag second base. Frank Chance stood on second and hollered for the ball. A Giants’ player saw what was happening and threw the ball into the stands. The Cubs retrieved the ball (or got another one), and the umpire called the force-out nullifying the run.
     With destiny taking completely over, the Cubs and Giants finished the season a few weeks later tied for the National League lead. The Cubs won the replayed game 4-2 at the Polo Grounds and got into the 1908 World Series. Fred Merkle never got over his blunder, and it haunted him the rest of his life.
Orval Overall and Mordecai “Three Finger” Brown, two memorable names out of baseball’s distant past, won two games each in the 1908 World Series. Brown lost part of his right index finger and injured other fingers in childhood accidents, and the result was a grip that gave his sinker a late dip that elevated him to a Hall-of-Fame career.

AFTER A LONG DROUGHT the Cubs resurged in 1929 and were contenders for the next 10 years. They won the National League pennant at precisely spaced, three-year intervals: 1929, 1932, 1935 and 1938. And were runner-ups to the Yankees for the best record in the big leagues during the 1930’s. Despite these successes, the Cubs were a four-time World Series also-ran.
The Cubs lost the World Series again in 1945 to the Detroit Tigers and haven’t gotten into one since. Prospects were bright in 1969, 1984, 1989, 1998, 2003, 2007 and 2008 but the Cubs came up short in all these chances for the big prize. Like the stock market the Cubs climb a wall of worry, but unlike many long-term investors the club hasn’t gotten a big payoff in over 100 years.
The Cubbies’ faithful grapple for a clue to this seemingly endless injustice; Chicago lore suggests that the Cubs labor under a curse brought on by a Greek tavern owner. Legend has it that William “Billy Goat” Sianis tried to get his goat into Wrigley Field for the 1945 Series and was refused. He laid down a curse on the Cubs by saying that they would never get into a World Series again. Later, in a futile effort to break the curse, a goat was brought into Wrigley Field, but all that got was a few laughs. And the vignettes that follow deliver a few more.

CONNIE, HACK, BABE AND GABBY. Connie Mack became manager of the Philadelphia Athletics in 1901. The “Tall Tactician” was a dignified, scorecard-waving leader in a business suit who won five World Championships and built two dynasties with four pennants in five years from 1910 to 1914 and three in a row from 1929 to 1931.
Mack was just beyond the midpoint of his enduring managerial career when the Athletics met the pre-curse Cubs in the 1929 World Series. The A’s went up two games to one, but the Cubs led game four 8-0 and seemed a sure bet to even the Series. In what became a threadbare Cubs’ script that often borders on farce (the sun got between two fly balls and Hack Wilson’s glove), the A’s rallied hard, scored 10 runs in the seventh inning and won the game, and went on to win the title. Connie Mack managed the Philadelphia Athletics until his retirement at the age of 88 in 1950. He holds the mark for most wins (3,776) by a skipper.
Cubs’ slugger Hack Wilson’s 159 RBI’s contributed mightily to the 1929 National League championship and presaged what he accomplished the following season. Wilson was a five-six fireplug with lightning bat speed and a love for the bottle. It was said he was a “lowball hitter and a highball drinker.” After one all-nighter a teammate asked Hack how he could drink so much and still hit. Wilson said, “When I see three baseballs I swing at the middle one.” A winner of four home run titles while with the Cubs, his 1930 season still inspires awe - 191 RBI (the all-time major league record), 56 home runs (a National League record for 68 years) and a .356 batting average. Alcohol shortened his career and led to his death at age 48.

“For years, it was impossible for me to look at any round outfielder who could hit a long ball without deciding I had found myself another Hack Wilson.”  -Bill Veeck

PACKING HEAT IN THE WINDY CITY. Midway through the 1932 season shortstop Bill Jurges was shot twice in a Chicago hotel room by a jilted girlfriend with a less-than-perfect aim. The wounds were fixed, and Jurges rejoined the team a few weeks later. The Cubs won the National League pennant, but the shooting was not a good World Series omen.
In 1949, ex-Cub Eddie Waitkus visited Chicago with his new team, the Philadelphia Phillies. He was shot and seriously injured in the Edgewater Beach hotel by an unhinged female stalker who became obsessed with Waitkus during his time with the Cubs. He survived to play again. It is generally believed that the book and film The Natural was loosely based on the Jurges and Waitkus shootings.

Getting back to 1932, The New York Yankees swept the Cubs in the World Series (minus Hack Wilson who had been traded to the Brooklyn Dodgers). Among a barrage of Yankee hits, Babe Ruth’s “called shot” made the series memorable. In the fifth inning of game three Ruth pointed to the center-field bleachers. On the next pitch he launched a mammoth home run in that direction. The Babe was getting a riding from the Cubs’ bench, and some say he gestured toward the dugout. However, film of the incident appears to show Ruth pointing toward the outfield. Posterity likes that version better.

TIGERS’ REVENGE. In 1935, the Cubs met the Detroit Tigers for the first time since they beat them consecutively in the World Series of 1907 and 1908. Led by the hitting of Pete Fox, Charlie Gehringer, and Mickey Cochrane, who singled and scored the winning run in the ninth inning of game six, the Tigers won the Series four games to two.
The highlight of the 1935 Cubs’ season was future Hall-of-Fame catcher Gabby Hartnett’s “Homer in the Gloamin’.” The Cubs and Pittsburgh Pirates battled for the pennant in the final days of the season when player/manager Hartnett beat the Pirates with a two-out, 0-2 count home run onto Waveland Avenue in the gathering Wrigley Field darkness as the game was about to be called. The Cubs went on to win the pennant on the most famous home run in their history, but, in a repeat of 1932, the New York Yankees swept them in the World Series.

CLAWED AGAIN. The 1945 World Series began less than two months after the end of World War Two. Organized baseball’s ability to survive had become increasingly precarious through each succeeding year of the war as the pool of able-bodied players steadily depleted. Since the Cubs and Tigers had the deepest pools, it was no surprise that both teams led their leagues.
The sizzling hitting of perennial all-star third baseman “Smiling Stan” Hack (he was also the Cubs’ hitting star of the 1938 World Series loss to the Yankees) and the pitching of Hank Borowy (who was acquired in mid-season from the Yankees) propelled the Cubs into game seven. Then, in a losing wager, they pitched Borowy on one day’s rest; he was chased, and the Cubs lost another World Series. Their search for the big prize was 100-years old in 2008. (Has any other team, in any major sport, gone 100 years without winning a title?)
The overall quality of play in the 1945 World Series was spotty, with the two teams committing a bunch of errors of commission and omission. In one of these miscues, the over-40-years Cub Jack Hostetler tripped and fell rounding third base costing the Cubs a key run. In those pre-television days, admired New York sportswriter Bill Corum made the most incisive summation on radio, “We’ve had everything in this series but a wedding at home plate.” Corum’s remark was likely an indictment of bush league play. Before the war and for several years after, weddings at home plate were commonplace in the minor leagues.
Hank Wyse won 22 games for the Cubs in 1945, often on only two days rest. This regimen took its toll on his arm. In 1946 he had elbow problems and went to see a doctor. When Wyse returned to the clubhouse a teammate asked him what the doctor found in his elbow. Wyse said, “bottlecaps.”
           
LIPPY AND THE MET’S HEX. After a 24-year drought, Chicago cruised toward the 1969 National League playoffs. The Cubs had solid starters with Ferguson Jenkins (the only member of the 3,000-strikeout club to have surrendered fewer than 1,000 walks), Bill Hands and Ken Holtzman. And with slugging outfielder Billy Williams and the solid infield play and hitting of Ernie Banks and Ron Santo, the Cubs were nine and a half games up on the New York Mets in mid-August. Then the Cubs began to melt like ice cream in the bleachers.
For many Cubs’ fans, daytime baseball was a new villain in the narrative of Cubs’ curses. In 1969, Wrigley Field was still without lights, and the Cubs were the last team in baseball to play only day games at home. Manager Leo Durocher had a well-established reputation for preferring a set lineup composed of experienced veterans, and he had little patience for grooming rookies. As a result, and with limited exceptions, Durocher played the same eight-man lineup of war-horses, day in and day out, throughout an enervating Chicago summer. The consequence of this strategy was an exhausted starting lineup that had nothing left to give down the stretch. Things got even more painful in September when the “Amazing Mets,” who finished last in the National League in 1968, won ten straight. The Cubs lost eight in a row and finished the season eight games back. In one of these losses at Shea Stadium, a black cat ran in front of the Cubs’ dugout and right by Ron Santo waiting in the on-deck circle. If 1969 wasn’t the worst late-season disintegration, it ranks down there among classic baseball flops.
The 1966-1970 Cubs may be the only team to play together that long with three future Hall of Fame players: Banks, Jenkins, Williams, plus Ron Santo who should be in the Hall and never win a pennant.

CALIFORNIA DREAMING. In 1984, Cubs’ second baseman and future Hall-of-Famer Ryne Sandberg was the National League MVP. His inspired play and Rick Sutcliffe’s masterful pitching helped the Cubs finish first in the East (39 years after the World Series loss to the Tigers). Only a few pitchers have won 20 games in a season while pitching for two different teams. Rick Sutcliffe is one of them. He came to the Cubs during the 1984 campaign with a 4-5 record and made it a career year by going 16-1 and winning the National League Cy Young Award as a unanimous selection.
The Cubs’ playoff opponent was the Western Champion San Diego Padres led by Tony Gwynn who hit .351 to win the first of eight batting titles. The Cubs won the first two games at home, and the final three games were in San Diego. All the Cubs had to do was win one more and they would capture the National League pennant. They surely wouldn’t lose three straight, would they?
Their second best chance came in game four, but the Padres’ Steve Garvey spoiled the Cubs’ hopes with a walk-off home run in the last of the ninth inning. The image of Garvey circling the bases with his brawny right arm held high looms large in the Cubs’ collection of bad dreams.
In their best chance, the Cubs led in the seventh inning of game five, but were overtaken by a San Diego rally in which the key event was an unusual Chicago error committed by the typically sure-handed first baseman, Leon Durham. The inning appeared to have come to a harmless conclusion when a routine ground ball that should have been the inning’s third out was hit directly to Durham. When Durham bent down to pick up the baseball, it mysteriously skidded off his glove and rolled into the outfield, and it was Katie bar the door from there. And what turned out to be the reason for the error? It seems that Durham had been drinking Gatorade in the dugout and some of it spilled onto his glove. Because Durham had been less than fully attentive while wiping it off a residue remained, and when that dried it left a sticky surface. When the routine ground ball came in contact with that sticky place, it unexpectedly skidded off Durham’s glove, resulting in the fatal error. Why didn’t the stickiness help retain the baseball. Hey, it’s the Cubs, also known to many of their fans as “The Lovable Losers.” A string of hits followed, and the Cubs didn’t get into the playoffs again until 1989.

THE BOYS OF ZIMMER. Paced by 19-game winner Greg Maddux, the Cubs won the National League Eastern division in 1989 and met the San Francisco Giants for the pennant. The Cubs, known as “The Boys of Zimmer,” so-named for manager Don Zimmer, split the first two games in Chicago. The Cubs led by a run in the seventh inning of game three in San Francisco when the Giants got a runner on. Cubs’ pitcher Rick Sutcliffe went to 2-0 on the next batter, and Zimmer lifted him. (Sutcliffe was in the final year of his successful career and taking lots of time between pitches. When asked why later, Sutcliffe said he was waiting for the pain to leave his shoulder.) Reliever Les Lancaster wasn’t told, or didn’t understand, or something that the count was 2-0, thought it was 3-0, and delivered a cookie to the Giants’ Robby Thompson who cowtailed it for a game-winning home run. The Giants went on to win the next two games and the pennant, and the Cubs waited nine years for their next chance.

1998. The Cubs and San Francisco Giants (led by future Cubs’ manager Dusty Baker and National League Manager of the Year in 1998) ended the regular season with identical records and met in a one-game playoff game for the National League wild-card berth that the Cubs won. The Atlanta Braves then swept them in the first playoff round. Former Cub (why did they ever let him go?) Gregg Maddux won game three.

“The last time the Cubs won a World Series was in 1908. The last time they were in one was in 1945. Hey, any team can have a bad century.”  -Tom Trebelhorn, 1990’s Cubs’ manager, who was fired soon after he said it. (Longtime Cubs’ announcer Jack Brickhouse is credited for coining “Any team can have a bad century.”)            

SCAPE, RATHER THAN BILLY, GOAT. The Cubs most promising chance for a crown since the 1945 World Series and the 1969, 1984, 1989, and 1998 season-ending disappointments came in 2003. They upset the Braves (avenging the 1998 playoff sweep) in the National League Division Series to win their first post-season series since 1908.
In the 6th game of the NLCS, the Cubs led the Florida Marlins three games to two. Cubs’ star Mark Prior pitched into the 8th inning with a 3-0 lead and one out. Was this the year? Was the curse finally lifted?
After a leadoff double, the Marlins caught a break. A high fly near the left-field stands might have saved the inning. The ball went foul into the stands and was deflected by a fan. The fan didn’t reach out over the field. He did what anyone else would have done. He went for a souvenir. What the fan didn’t see was Cubs’ left fielder Moises Alou leaping with his glove high above and inside the railing. Alou might have made the catch if the fan hadn’t interfered, but the fan’s attempt didn’t cause the Cubs subsequent implosion (although the hateful abuse poured down upon the poor devil showed that the crowd wanted a scapegoat). The reprieved batter walked. A single scored a run. Prior looked perturbed. The next Marlins’ hitter grounded to short, and the usually sure-handed Alex Gonzalez booted what looked like an inning-ending double play.

“When troubles come, they come not single spies, but in battalions.” -William Shakespeare

Then future Cub Derrek Lee tied the score with a two-run double, and Prior was finally lifted. Manager Dusty Baker brought in reliever Kyle Farnsworth who didn’t have much time to get loose, eventually gave up a three-run double, and the Cubs lost what turned into a one-sided game.
The hugely talented Kerry Wood started game seven for the Cubs and didn’t have it that day. Led by their dominating right-hander Josh Beckett, the upstart Marlins went on to beat the Yankees in the World Series. (2003 was the year when the fans’ amusement with Cubs’ failures turned to frustration.)

THE DEFENSE RESTS. The score was 1-1 after six innings in game one of the 2007 best-of-five Division-Series against the Arizona Diamondbacks. Cubs’ ace Carlos Zambrano had given only a few hits on 85 pitches. Because they couldn’t do much with him, the Diamondbacks were delighted when manager Lou Piniella lifted Zambrano, presumably to rest him for a game four. Arizona homered off the reliever in the seventh and added another run to seal the win. There never was a game four.

SORCERESS. In 2008, the Cubs made their first back-back trip to the post-season since 1910; the Cubs and White Sox got into the playoffs during the same year for the first time since the 1906 World Series; and both teams lost in the opening round.
Expectations were moderate for the White Sox and lofty for the Cubs who topped the National League with 97 wins. They met the Los Angeles Dodgers, newly led by ex-Yankee manager Joe Torres and slugger Manny Ramirez who hit .396 for L.A. following a blockbuster, mid-season trade from the Red Sox. The Dodgers dispatched the Cubs Buenos Dias, Buenas Tardes, Buenas Noches.
The Hundred Years’ War rages on as the vaporous curse further envelops the Friendly Confines; a nostrum requires that She of the Evil Eye expunge the malediction by sacrificing a goat and black cat on the sacred plot between the mound and home plate.

(Selected credit by permission from the National Baseball Hall of Fame, Cooperstown, NY and Library of Canada for sources in original story excerpted and abridged from Guts in the Clutch, see below.)

Richard J. Noyes, former Associate Director, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a consultant to public and private sector organizations.

Noyes is the co-author with Pamela J. Robertson of Larceny of Love, a provocative print and eBook novel that traces the interwoven careers of three men in jeopardy (one of whom is a professional pitcher who suffers from sudden, extreme, unexplained, career-threatening wildness) and the unforgettable women in their lives.  http://larcenyoflove.com/ 

“Whenever dramatic storytelling about people you like is created around business, sports and film, I'm a happy reader. I'm sure you will be as well.”  –Kevin Marcus

Another recent print and eBook by Richard Noyes and Pamela Robertson: Guts in the Clutch: 77 Legendary Triumphs, Heartbreaks, and Wild Finishes in 12 Sports, with a Foreword by Drew Olson of ESPN.   http://gutsintheclutch.com/

“The best compilation of fascinating sports stories I have read.” -David Houle, Emmy and Peabody Award-winning producer of documentaries on Hank Aaron and the Harlem Globetrotters.